Re: Documentation Update: Document pg_start_backup checkpoint behavior

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Renner <michael(dot)renner(at)amd(dot)co(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation Update: Document pg_start_backup checkpoint behavior
Date: 2009-04-04 01:09:03
Message-ID: 200904040109.n34193x03580@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >> + ereport(NOTICE,
> >> + (errmsg("performing checkpoint")));
>
> > You've *got* to be kidding.
>
> Sigh. I have to apologize for that over-hasty complaint: I misread
> where you intended to put the message. (Seems like there is too
> much stuff in xlog.c that executes in too many different contexts.
> Maybe we could split it up sometime.)

No question xlog.c has been a dumping ground for our increasing xlog
features.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-04 01:36:05 Re: Documentation Update: Document pg_start_backup checkpoint behavior
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-04-04 01:08:05 Re: Documentation Update: Document pg_start_backup checkpoint behavior