Re: <note> on hash indexes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: <note> on hash indexes
Date: 2009-02-07 20:06:00
Message-ID: 200902072006.n17K60D18556@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> I had submitted the documentation change as part of my
> hash function patch but it was removed as not relevant.
> (It wasn't really.) I would basically remove the first
> sentence:
>
> Note: Hash index operations are not presently WAL-logged,
> so hash indexes might need to be rebuilt with REINDEX after a
> database crash. For this reason, hash index use is presently
> discouraged.

Change made and attached; thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/diff text/x-diff 1.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-02-07 20:11:18 Re: LIMIT NULL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-02-07 19:58:21 Re: Updated backslash consistency patch