|From:||Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>|
|To:||Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>|
|Cc:||rhubbell <Rhubbell(at)iHubbell(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: Pet Peeves?|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
Gregory Stark wrote:
> rhubbell <Rhubbell(at)iHubbell(dot)com> writes:
> > What's your list look like? Or maybe you want everyone else to do your work
> > for you and don't have anything to share.
> Heh, fair enough. Perhaps I should just say you should come to FOSDEM though
> The usual bugaboos are things like having to do a dump/restore to upgrade,
> weak support for partitioning, no index-only-scans, etc. Things which have
> been mentioned several times.
> One thing which has *not* been mentioned which i find positively shocking is
> VACUUM. This was once our single biggest source of user complaints. Between
> Autovacuum improvements and HOT previously and the free space map in 8.4 the
> situation will be much improved. However there are still some common usage
> patterns where people run into problems.
Yes, that is surprising, and something most database product struggle
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
|Next Message||Greg Smith||2009-01-30 21:48:16||Re: PGSQL or other DB?|
|Previous Message||Sam Mason||2009-01-30 21:25:35||Re: Pet Peeves?|