From: | rhubbell <Rhubbell(at)iHubbell(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Date: | 2009-01-30 21:10:37 |
Message-ID: | 20090130131037.b9f2ef15.Rhubbell@iHubbell.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:46:22 +0000
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> rhubbell <Rhubbell(at)iHubbell(dot)com> writes:
>
> > What's your list look like? Or maybe you want everyone else to do your work
> > for you and don't have anything to share.
>
> Heh, fair enough. Perhaps I should just say you should come to FOSDEM though
> :)
Haha, yeah buy the book, come to the show, see the movie.
Well I don't know what is FOSDEM. Will the talks be placed online
at some point? Up to each contributor? I'll check out what's FOSDEM.
>
> The usual bugaboos are things like having to do a dump/restore to upgrade,
> weak support for partitioning, no index-only-scans, etc. Things which have
> been mentioned several times.
>
> One thing which has *not* been mentioned which i find positively shocking is
> VACUUM. This was once our single biggest source of user complaints. Between
> Autovacuum improvements and HOT previously and the free space map in 8.4 the
> situation will be much improved. However there are still some common usage
> patterns where people run into problems.
I think it was mentioned.
Anyway glad to see that there's vibrant discussion here. Usually a sign of
a healthy community.
>
> --
> Gregory Stark
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
> Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Mason | 2009-01-30 21:25:35 | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Previous Message | Tony Caduto | 2009-01-30 20:49:56 | Re: PGSQL or other DB? |