Re: New 8.4 hot standby feature

From: Gabi Julien <gabi(dot)julien(at)broadsign(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New 8.4 hot standby feature
Date: 2009-01-29 17:39:01
Message-ID: 200901291239.01611.gabi.julien@broadsign.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thursday 29 January 2009 02:43:18 you wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:53 -0500, Gabi Julien wrote:
> > I have merged the last hot standby patch (v9g) to 8.4 devel and I am
> > pleased with the experience. This is promising stuff.
>
> Thanks,
>
> > Perhaps it is a bit too soon to
> > ask questions here but here it is:
>
> Thanks very much for the bug report.
>
> > 1. Speed of recovery
> >
> > With a archive_timeout of 60 seconds, it can take about 4 minutes before
> > I see the reflected changes in the replica. This is normal since, in
> > addition to the WAL log shipping, it takes more time to do the recovery
> > itself. Still, is there any way besides the archive_timeout config option
> > to speed up the recovery of WAL logs on the hot standby?
>
> There was a reported bug whose apparent symptoms were delay of WAL
> files. The bug was not in fact anything to do with that at all, it was
> just delayed *visibility*. So I doubt very much that you have a
> performance problem.
>
> The bug fix patch is attached, verified to solve the problem.

Thanks. Please discard all my previous comments. This was the true source of
the issue that I was experiencing.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-29 17:39:54 Re: [GENERAL] Encoding problem using pg_dumpall
Previous Message Steve Crawford 2009-01-29 17:35:53 Re: Pet Peeves?