Re: pg_upgrade project status

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade project status
Date: 2009-01-27 15:08:00
Message-ID: 20090127150800.GM8123@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
[pg_upgrade...]
> Why is the deadline different than anything else?

err, isn't it because it'd be kind of difficult to do an upgrade script
with large catalog-changing patches outstanding..? I thought some
leeway was given for pg_upgrade specifically due to that, tho perhaps
I'm wrong.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-27 15:11:54 Re: Patch to add Windows 7 support
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-01-27 15:06:40 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle