Re: Documenting pglesslog

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documenting pglesslog
Date: 2009-01-11 04:38:27
Message-ID: 200901110438.n0B4cRO03385@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 21:09 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Comments?
>
> If this is for backpatching, it makes sense. We should at least wait
> until sync rep is accepted or rejected and docs written.

No, it is not for backpatching.

> In general I don't think we should refer/link to other companies'
> copyrighted materials in our documentation. That could cause
> difficulties.

It is BSD licensed. I don't see any copyright issues:

http://pglesslog.projects.postgresql.org/

> If you're going to do this, then I think you should go through the docs
> and refer directly to many other commonly used tools that are also on
> pg_foundry.

I add items where they fit logically.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2009-01-11 06:11:26 Re: Synch Rep v5
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-01-11 03:56:09 re-merged posix_fadvise patch