Re: Documenting pglesslog

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documenting pglesslog
Date: 2009-01-11 03:12:14
Message-ID: 1231643534.18005.746.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 21:09 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Comments?

If this is for backpatching, it makes sense. We should at least wait
until sync rep is accepted or rejected and docs written.

In general I don't think we should refer/link to other companies'
copyrighted materials in our documentation. That could cause
difficulties.

If you're going to do this, then I think you should go through the docs
and refer directly to many other commonly used tools that are also on
pg_foundry.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-01-11 03:56:09 re-merged posix_fadvise patch
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-01-11 03:03:24 Re: Hot standby, slot ids and stuff