Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Stephen R(dot) van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Date: 2009-01-05 16:45:49
Message-ID: 20090105164549.GG7345@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut escribió:
> James Mansion wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> c. Are there any well-known pitfalls/objections which would prevent
>>>> me from
>>>> changing the algorithm to something more efficient (read: IO-bound)?
>>>
>>> copyright licenses and patents
>>>
>> Would it be possible to have a plugin facility?
>
> Well, before we consider that, we'd probably want to see proof about the
> effectiveness of other compression methods.

I did some measurements months ago, and it was very clear that libz
compression was a lot tighter than the PGLZ code.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-05 16:52:35 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1386)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-05 16:34:23 Re: EmitWarningsOnPlaceholders is too quiet