From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
Cc: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Copyright update |
Date: | 2009-01-01 20:28:51 |
Message-ID: | 200901012028.n01KSp023127@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 14:47 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andrew Chernow wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Greg Stark wrote:
> > > >> Is that actually legal if we haven't modified the files? Or is the
> > > >> whole source tree considiered one work?
> > > >
> > > > One work, I assume.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I am not a lawyer, but if its one work, why is there a notice in every source
> > > file? ISTM that if it were one work there would only have to be one notice.
> >
> > Because people often take source files and copy them for use in other
> > projects.
>
> I think the correct resolution to the question is to ask legal. Yes?
So I can get three different answers? It is not a priority for me.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-01 20:30:26 | Re: posix_fadvise v22 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-01 20:28:43 | Re: Copyright update |