| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Copyright update |
| Date: | 2009-01-01 20:16:32 |
| Message-ID: | 1230840992.28816.21.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 14:47 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Chernow wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Greg Stark wrote:
> > >> Is that actually legal if we haven't modified the files? Or is the
> > >> whole source tree considiered one work?
> > >
> > > One work, I assume.
> > >
> >
> > I am not a lawyer, but if its one work, why is there a notice in every source
> > file? ISTM that if it were one work there would only have to be one notice.
>
> Because people often take source files and copy them for use in other
> projects.
I think the correct resolution to the question is to ask legal. Yes?
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-01 20:28:43 | Re: Copyright update |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-01 19:47:58 | Re: Copyright update |