| From: | Reg Me Please <regmeplease(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Dennis Brakhane <brakhane(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Transactions within a function body |
| Date: | 2008-10-02 15:18:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200810021718.59515.regmeplease@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Il Thursday 02 October 2008 17:10:23 Alvaro Herrera ha scritto:
> Reg Me Please escribió:
> > Il Thursday 02 October 2008 16:15:10 Alvaro Herrera ha scritto:
> > > You can nest blocks arbitrarily, giving you the chance to selectively
> > > rollback pieces of the function. It's only a bit more awkward.
> >
> > You mean I can issue a ROLLBACK command within a BEGIN...END; block to
> > roll it back?
>
> No -- I mean you can use BEGIN/EXCEPTION/END blocks as you like, nesting
> them or putting one after another. Complementing this with RAISE
> EXCEPTION you can cause savepoints to roll back at will.
Now I understand. (Sorry, me dumb!)
Looks quirky, but I trust it's working. I'll give that a try.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-02 15:28:13 | Re: Transactions within a function body |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-10-02 15:10:23 | Re: Transactions within a function body |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2008-10-02 15:27:00 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-10-02 15:10:23 | Re: Transactions within a function body |