| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Reg Me Please <regmeplease(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Dennis Brakhane <brakhane(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Transactions within a function body |
| Date: | 2008-10-02 15:10:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20081002151023.GB4151@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Reg Me Please escribió:
> Il Thursday 02 October 2008 16:15:10 Alvaro Herrera ha scritto:
> > You can nest blocks arbitrarily, giving you the chance to selectively
> > rollback pieces of the function. It's only a bit more awkward.
>
> You mean I can issue a ROLLBACK command within a BEGIN...END; block to roll it
> back?
No -- I mean you can use BEGIN/EXCEPTION/END blocks as you like, nesting
them or putting one after another. Complementing this with RAISE
EXCEPTION you can cause savepoints to roll back at will.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Reg Me Please | 2008-10-02 15:18:59 | Re: Transactions within a function body |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-02 15:09:17 | Re: tsearch 2 query |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Reg Me Please | 2008-10-02 15:18:59 | Re: Transactions within a function body |
| Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2008-10-02 14:48:32 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |