| From: | "Stephen R(dot) van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: parallel pg_restore |
| Date: | 2008-09-23 07:14:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20080923071433.GA28639@cuci.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>There are in fact very few letters available, as we've been fairly
>>profligate in our use of option letters in the pg_dump suite.
>>j and m happen to be two of those that are available.
>--max-workers
Perhaps, but please do not use that as justification for using -m.
That would be equally silly as abbreviating "number of workers" to -n.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-23 07:44:19 | Re: parallel pg_restore |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-09-23 05:40:10 | Re: parallel pg_restore |