| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: parallel pg_restore |
| Date: | 2008-09-23 07:44:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1222155859.4445.296.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:05 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> j and m happen to be two of those that are available.
>
> I honestly don't have a terribly strong opinion about what it should be
> called. I can live with jobs or multi-threads.
Perhaps we can use -j for jobs and -m for memory, so we can set memory
available across all threads with a single total value.
I can live with jobs or multi-threads also, whichever we decide. Neither
one is confusing to explain.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-09-23 08:12:16 | Re: macport for libpqxx |
| Previous Message | Stephen R. van den Berg | 2008-09-23 07:14:33 | Re: parallel pg_restore |