Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch
Date: 2008-09-17 14:47:01
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Is physical_tlist optimization sensible for RecursiveScan? We seem
> to use it for every other Scan node type.

To enable physical_tlist optimization, it seems build_physical_tlist,
use_physical_tlist and disuse_physical_tlist need to be
changed. build_physical_tlist and use_physical_tlist have been already
patched and only disuse_physical_tlist needs to be patched. Any other
place I miss to enable the optimization?
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-17 14:52:20 Re: Autovacuum and Autoanalyze
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2008-09-17 14:37:37 Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs)