Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch
Date: 2008-09-17 14:59:13
Message-ID: 13598.1221663553@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Is physical_tlist optimization sensible for RecursiveScan? We seem
>> to use it for every other Scan node type.

> To enable physical_tlist optimization, it seems build_physical_tlist,
> use_physical_tlist and disuse_physical_tlist need to be
> changed. build_physical_tlist and use_physical_tlist have been already
> patched and only disuse_physical_tlist needs to be patched. Any other
> place I miss to enable the optimization?

IIRC, the comment for build_physical_tlist hadn't been patched, but
yeah that seems like about it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2008-09-17 15:05:13 Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-17 14:52:20 Re: Autovacuum and Autoanalyze