Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum
Date: 2008-09-10 22:48:04
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Anyway I think we are on the same page about the rest of the issues.
> >> Did you want to work on fixing them, or shall I?
> > Is this more or less what you had in mind?
> Yeah, this looks like exactly what I had in mind for HEAD. I'm not too
> sure about the back branches though. I think we could apply all of it
> to 8.3, but further back is going to require a separate investigation
> for each branch. Will you take that on?


Alvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-10 23:31:13 Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-10 21:32:34 Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum