Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum
Date: 2008-09-10 21:32:34
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Anyway I think we are on the same page about the rest of the issues.
>> Did you want to work on fixing them, or shall I?

> Is this more or less what you had in mind?

Yeah, this looks like exactly what I had in mind for HEAD. I'm not too
sure about the back branches though. I think we could apply all of it
to 8.3, but further back is going to require a separate investigation
for each branch. Will you take that on?

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-09-10 22:48:04 Re: Interesting glitch in autovacuum
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-10 21:06:37 Re: [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery