Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf
Date: 2008-08-20 12:51:06
Message-ID: 20080820125106.GA4169@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:40 AM, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> > I am not arguing for this but if we went down that route it does buy us
> > the ability to compartmentalize the entire conf.. so you have:
> >
> > memory_settings.conf
> > logging.conf
> > maintenance.conf
>
> Would make it damn hard for pgAdmin to figure out how to edit the
> config though. That's why we only support single-file configs atm.

That's why we're working on adding a "sourcefile" attribute to GUC, so
that it's trivial to know the path of the config file each settings
comes from.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-08-20 13:01:51 Re: Extending varlena
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-08-20 12:50:27 Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures