| From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
| Date: | 2008-08-19 20:37:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20080819133707.561c4751@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:22:43 -0400
Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> A formal policy that's any more detailed than what's in the FAQ today
> is a solution in search of a problem.
Odd that the problem continues to rear its head though isn't it? This
certainly isn't the first time it has come up. I have however made my
argument. I also tried to help solve the problem. If we aren't
interested in a solution, oh well. It doesn't make my life any harder.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-08-19 20:38:36 | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-08-19 20:25:51 | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |