Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-25 14:42:03
Message-ID: 20080725144203.GH9891@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:37 +0300, Asko Oja wrote:

> > One of reasons to get PL/proxy into core is to make it available to
> > Windows users also.
> > The idea is to get to the situation
> >
> > createlang plproxy mydb
> >
> > If we can achieve this without putting plproxy into core then i would
> > like to hear how.

Sounds like you just need to get a new row in the standard pg_pltemplate.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-25 15:19:41 Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump
Previous Message Xiao Meng 2008-07-25 14:26:05 [patch] gsoc, improving hash index v2