Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving

From: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Xiao Meng <mx(dot)cogito(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving
Date: 2008-07-17 17:54:18
Message-ID: 20080717175418.GK337@it.is.rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:42:39PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Xiao Meng escribi?:
> > The patch store hash code only in the index tuple.
> > It based on Neil Conway's patch with an old version of PostgreSQL.
> > It passes the regression test but I didn't test the performance yet.
> > Anyone interested can make a performance test;-)
> > You can undefine the macro HASHVALUE_ONLY in hash.h to get the
> > original implementation.
>
> I think having the HASHVALUE_ONLY define is not a good idea -- it just
> makes the patch harder to read. I suggest just removing the old code
> and putting the new code in place. (That's why we have revision
> control.)
>
One thing it helps is building an old version and a new version
for comparative testing. Otherwise, you could end up with an apples-to-
oranges comparison. I certainly think that the final patch should not
have it, but it is useful now for testing and comparisons.

My two cents,
Ken

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-07-17 18:00:07 Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2008-07-17 17:48:32 Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving