Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-06-10 01:49:52
Message-ID: 20080610014952.GF10034@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Agreed. I realize why we are not zeroing those bytes (for performance),
> but can't we have the archiver zero those bytes before calling the
> 'archive_command'?

Perhaps make the zeroing user-settable.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-10 01:50:58 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-06-10 01:46:06 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-06-10 01:50:58 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-06-10 01:46:06 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL