Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-06-10 01:46:06
Message-ID: 200806100146.m5A1k6125570@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2008 16:22:41 -0400 (EDT) Greg Smith wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 30 May 2008, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> >
> > > Then you ship 16 MB binary stuff every 30 second or every minute but
> > > you only have some kbyte real data in the logfile.
> >
> > Not if you use pg_clearxlogtail (
> > http://www.2ndquadrant.com/replication.htm ), which got lost in the giant
> > March commitfest queue but should probably wander into contrib as part of
> > 8.4.
>
> Yes, this topic was discussed several times in the past but to
> solve this it needs a patch/solution which is integrated into PG
> itself, not contrib.

Agreed. I realize why we are not zeroing those bytes (for performance),
but can't we have the archiver zero those bytes before calling the
'archive_command'?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-06-10 01:49:52 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-06-10 01:25:17 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-06-10 01:49:52 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-06-10 01:25:17 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL