| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2008-05-29 20:54:04 |
| Message-ID: | 200805292054.m4TKs4O26040@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote:
> > What is your justification for denigrating this plan with that? Or
> > are you merely complaining because we know we won't be all the way
> > there in 8.4?
>
> Again, just my humble opinion, but given the stated goal, which I
> agree with, I'd say it's worth holding up 8.4 until some kind of
> out-of-the-box replication advances that goal, where Yet Another
> Toolkit Suitable For People Who Are Already Database Kernel Hackers To
> Build Replication Systems On Top Of does not.
I am confused why we would hold 8.4 when no one said we should hold 8.3
because we didn't have built-in replication.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-05-29 20:55:42 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-05-29 20:50:51 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-05-29 20:55:03 | Re: replication hooks |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-05-29 20:50:51 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |