Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming back-branch update releases

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming back-branch update releases
Date: 2008-05-29 14:41:08
Message-ID: 200805291441.m4TEf8B17689@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > If you've got any bug fixes you've been working on, now is a good time
> > to get them finished up and sent in...
>
> Has the s/\x09/ /g patch for psql from Bruce and you been
> backported to 8.3? I didn't see it on pgsql-commiters.

No. I have not backpatched it because Tom found a problem with my
applied patch and did a second patch.

I am attaching both patches. The second one is Tom's and I don't
understand it well enough to backpatch it.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/diff text/x-diff 5.0 KB
/rtmp/diff2 text/x-diff 28.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-29 14:41:51 Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2008-05-29 14:33:53 Re: [PERFORM] Memory question on win32 systems

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-29 14:41:51 Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-05-29 14:14:38 Re: Upcoming back-branch update releases