Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > This doesn't look like our normal coding standards, and should
> > probably be changed:
> > + if (0 != stat(BACKUP_LABEL_FILE, &stat_buf))
> >
> > (there's a number of similar places)
>
> I see. Lacking guidelines, I now copied how stat(2) is used in
> other parts of the code.
Applied with some minor changes to the error messages to make them
closer to our guidelines. (With my track record, it's not entirely
unlikely that someone will fix them further though :-P)
//Magnus