From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |
Date: | 2008-04-15 23:59:34 |
Message-ID: | 200804152359.m3FNxYV11712@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Here is a little different idea. Seems we want something more like:
>
> Yeah, I thought about building a set of macros that would have this
> ability folded in, but it didn't seem like much notational advantage
> given that you have to write the cleanup routine out-of-line anyway.
Yea, agreed. I am a little worried about the out-of-line issue because
some cases might become more complex because you have to pass lots of
parameters, perhaps.
> Also, until we have a lot more than three use-sites, more macros
> don't seem to be worth the trouble.
Oh, only three use sites. I thought we had three wrong sites but that
more had to be changed. Yea, go for it!
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-16 03:58:40 | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-15 23:47:25 | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-16 00:50:25 | Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-15 23:47:25 | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |