| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |
| Date: | 2008-04-15 23:47:25 |
| Message-ID: | 18626.1208303245@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Here is a little different idea. Seems we want something more like:
Yeah, I thought about building a set of macros that would have this
ability folded in, but it didn't seem like much notational advantage
given that you have to write the cleanup routine out-of-line anyway.
Also, until we have a lot more than three use-sites, more macros
don't seem to be worth the trouble.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-15 23:59:34 | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-15 23:30:22 | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-15 23:59:34 | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-15 23:30:22 | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |