Re: Feature freeze status

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze status
Date: 2008-04-08 02:05:09
Message-ID: 200804080205.m38259G27240@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Maybe we should make the next commit-fest June 1 to give people some time
> >> off? And some time to improve the tools?
>
> > Agreed.
>
> I don't agree, not even a little bit. The reason this fest has been so
> long and painful is that the queue had accumulated so much stuff. If we
> slip the fest schedule we just start building up a large queue again.
>
> Better tools would be good, but unless someone commits to producing a
> tool that will be ready by June but not by May, that's not a good reason
> to slide either.

Fine with me --- I just wanted to give Tom a break.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-04-08 02:55:58 Re: Feature freeze status
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-08 01:50:52 Re: Feature freeze status