Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)

From: Kevin Hunter <hunteke(at)earlham(dot)edu>
To: Zdeněk Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Postgres General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)
Date: 2008-03-26 17:10:28
Message-ID: 20080326131028.51a5e3c4@mailer.earlham.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 10:25a -0400 on Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Zdeněk Kotala wrote:
> And after long discussion on patches and hackers list we have made a
> decision than we need input from wide audience. This is a reason why
> I prepare following surveys.

1. b
2. b
3. b (but whichever, just be consistent)
4. b & c

I don't care, really. The value of pg_* is that it'd obvious it's
Postgres related, it'd be consistent with at least two other APIs I
already know, it'd be easy for noobs to find with "pg_<tab><tab>", and
leaves room in a cooperative sense with other DBs that might eventually
want to do something similar.

That said I'm with Sam Mason: it's a wash if I use SQL or them.
However, they're very nice for beginners, and getting beginners to
start with a project is 3/4ths the battle in'nit?

Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-26 17:12:21 Re: Timezones in 8.2.7
Previous Message Diogo Biazus 2008-03-26 17:05:10 Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...)