Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based
Date: 2008-03-22 16:08:34
Message-ID: 20080322090834.73e090bb@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:34:38 +0100
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> > Well, then we will forever be hostage to the will of the domain name
> > holder.
>
> Yes, but that would be equally true of the holder of the new domain.
> It would, however, make sense to have the domain reassigned to
> postgresql.org - it's currently owned by pgsql,inc. But you still

We can create a trustee agreement for this sort of thing.

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-03-22 16:10:58 Re: postgresql.org mail infrastructure
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-03-22 16:07:13 postgresql.org mail infrastructure