Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: We should get active / Wiki choice

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>
Cc: Koen Martens <gmc(at)sonologic(dot)nl>, Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>,damien(at)dalibo(dot)info, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: We should get active / Wiki choice
Date: 2008-02-26 11:26:53
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgeu-general
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:59:29AM +0100, Jean-Paul Argudo wrote:
> > However, if you have a properly configured wiki, with good access
> > control support, you can take that burden from the user and avoid
> > mistakes like that. Mediawiki [...]
> Yes, Mediawiki... well, we know.

I don't really know different wikis (and honestly, most of the ones I've
worked with I don't really like). But there is one big argument *for*
mediawiki: we already have this installed in the PostgreSQL infrastructure,
thus it's not an entirely new product that needs to go in. (It's a new
install of one, sure, but it's not a new product)


In response to


pgeu-general by date

Next:From: Koen MartensDate: 2008-02-26 11:31:11
Subject: Re: We should get active / Wiki choice
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2008-02-26 11:03:31
Subject: Re: WHAT to push to internet

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group