From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Koen Martens <gmc(at)sonologic(dot)nl>, Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>, damien(at)dalibo(dot)info, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: We should get active / Wiki choice |
Date: | 2008-02-26 11:26:53 |
Message-ID: | 20080226112653.GL528@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgeu-general |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:59:29AM +0100, Jean-Paul Argudo wrote:
> > However, if you have a properly configured wiki, with good access
> > control support, you can take that burden from the user and avoid
> > mistakes like that. Mediawiki [...]
>
> Yes, Mediawiki... well, we know.
I don't really know different wikis (and honestly, most of the ones I've
worked with I don't really like). But there is one big argument *for*
mediawiki: we already have this installed in the PostgreSQL infrastructure,
thus it's not an entirely new product that needs to go in. (It's a new
install of one, sure, but it's not a new product)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Koen Martens | 2008-02-26 11:31:11 | Re: We should get active / Wiki choice |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-26 11:03:31 | Re: WHAT to push to internet |