Re: libpq.rc make rule

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq.rc make rule
Date: 2008-02-26 09:26:04
Message-ID: 20080226092604.GD528@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:15:05AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> > > Yes, because newer builds may be linked against updated runtime
> > > versions. We need to be sure the installer will upgrade the file so it
> > > definitely matches any runtimes (or other dependencies) that we're
> > > also installing/upgrading.
> >
> > If it is so very important to update this file for every build, why are we
> > shipping it in the distribution tarball, which is done under the assumption
> > that it never has to be updated? Something doesn't fit here.
>
> That I can't answer.

It is to make it possible to build libpq "the old way" using nmake or
borland c++ - not requiring mingw or the perl stuff in src/tools/msvc.

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2008-02-26 09:37:07 Re: code cleanup of timestamp code
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-02-26 09:08:37 Re: Batch update of indexes on data loading