Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful
Date: 2008-01-18 00:43:46
Message-ID: 20080118004345.GQ17828@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > All this thread is a waste of time. We've previously agreed that we're
> > going to store autovacuum per-table settings in pg_class.reloptions.
>
> I had forgotten that discussion. So the plan is for the pg_autovacuum
> catalog to go away entirely, correct?

Yup.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-18 00:47:26 Re: [HACKERS] SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-18 00:38:24 Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful