Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful
Date: 2008-01-18 00:38:24
Message-ID: 18298.1200616704@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> All this thread is a waste of time. We've previously agreed that we're
> going to store autovacuum per-table settings in pg_class.reloptions.

I had forgotten that discussion. So the plan is for the pg_autovacuum
catalog to go away entirely, correct?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-18 00:43:46 Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-18 00:31:53 Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful