Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances
Date: 2007-12-27 16:50:46
Message-ID: 20071227165046.GJ5709@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tom Lane escribió:
> Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> > ... I didn't think this was a big problem because I
> > thought it was limited to developers who shot their own foot, but if there
> > are packagers turning this on to improve beta feedback it deserves some
> > wider mention.
>
> Yeah, binary packages that are built with --enable-cassert perhaps need
> to be labeled as "not intended for benchmarking" or some such.

Perhaps make them emit a WARNING at server start or something.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2007-12-27 16:54:44 Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-12-27 16:42:44 Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances