Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances
Date: 2007-12-27 16:04:38
Message-ID: 11851.1198771478@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> ... I didn't think this was a big problem because I
> thought it was limited to developers who shot their own foot, but if there
> are packagers turning this on to improve beta feedback it deserves some
> wider mention.

Yeah, binary packages that are built with --enable-cassert perhaps need
to be labeled as "not intended for benchmarking" or some such.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-David Beyer 2007-12-27 16:18:52 Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
Previous Message Greg Smith 2007-12-27 15:53:43 Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances