Re: Release Note Changes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Release Note Changes
Date: 2007-12-08 02:10:29
Message-ID: 200712080210.lB82ATA21935@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 16:21 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > Maybe the importance of the patches that were removed wasn't clear
> > > enough, so let me explain my viewpoint. On another part of this thread I
> > > summarised the feedback from others to a list of features that were
> > > definitely user noticeable. The list was:
> > >
> > > - Merge Join performance has been substantially improved when low number
> > > of duplicate join keys exist on the outer side of the join (Simon, Greg)
> >
> > Most users don't know if they are using mergejoins or not, nor are they
> > going to do anything differently now that the feature is in, so that is
> > why I don't see a need to mention it.
>
> Wow, what an amazing claim. Please post that to -performance!
>
> But if you applied that test, another half of the performance features
> should go also. As would many others in various other sections. I want
> them all to stay, so I won't point the finger at others. And why did we
> mention outer joins were tuned in 8.2?

Because outer joins are user-visible.

> The release notes are already 33 pages on Firefox's Print Preview, so a
> couple of extra sentences won't change anything.
>
> > > - Large I/O reduction during recovery when full_page_writes = on
> > > (Heikki)
> >
> > Again, a speedup, but not something that impacts people to behave
> > differently or see different output.
>
> Same comment.
>
> > > > If people are concerned about the unfairness, and I understand that, the
> > > > best solution is not to add more items to the release notes to be more
> > > > fair, but to remove all names from release note items.
> > >
> > > That makes no sense, but it would benefit people that wrote fewer
> > > patches, I guess.
> >
> > Yep, kind of illogical but it is fair.
>
> If we're at the stage of saying logic is irrelevant, then I'll never
> persuade you, probably of anything, ever...

You said above yourself you didn't want the names removed.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-12-08 02:17:36 Re: Release Note Changes
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-12-07 22:19:01 Re: Release Note Changes