| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Mike C(dot)" <smith(dot)not(dot)western(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #3790: pg_restore error canceling statement due to user request |
| Date: | 2007-12-03 15:12:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20071203151213.GF4386@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:13:53AM +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> "Mike C." <smith(dot)not(dot)western(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> > I don't know if this is either a wording change, or a more serious bug, but
> > when I do a pg_restore (from a 8.1.9 setup) to a fresh 8.3beta3 created
> > database (createdb command only), I repeatedly see:
> >
> > ERROR: canceling statement due to user request
> > CONTEXT: automatic analyze of table "dbs.public.entity_event"
>
> This is intentional, though perhaps the wording is confusing. What impression
> does the wording give you? Does it make you think something has gone wrong?
The fact that it says ERROR kind of hints that something has gone wrong,
no? (so yes, I agree the wording isn't very good)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthias | 2007-12-03 21:29:10 | BUG #3796: crash after select from indexed columns |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-03 00:14:14 | Re: BUG #3795: pg_dump is mis-dumping columns containing line breaks |