| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_ctl -t N register ?? |
| Date: | 2007-11-16 17:38:08 |
| Message-ID: | 200711161738.lAGHc8028867@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that the "pg_ctl register" synopsis was updated to have a
> -t parameter. This does not seem to make sense to me. Is it correct?
> Does it do anything?
>
> My thinking is that we should just remove the -t from that synopsis.
Well, Peter added it, but register already had the -w parameter, so
either register needs both -t and -w, or it needs neither of them. I
don't know which is true.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-11-16 17:39:50 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-16 17:18:09 | Re: Javascript support in the backend, i.e. PL/JS |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-11-16 19:17:28 | Re: pg_ctl -t N register ?? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-11-16 15:37:58 | pg_ctl -t N register ?? |