| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | pg_ctl -t N register ?? |
| Date: | 2007-11-16 15:37:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20071116153758.GA13714@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hi,
I just noticed that the "pg_ctl register" synopsis was updated to have a
-t parameter. This does not seem to make sense to me. Is it correct?
Does it do anything?
My thinking is that we should just remove the -t from that synopsis.
--
Alvaro Herrera Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
"Tiene valor aquel que admite que es un cobarde" (Fernandel)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-16 15:41:00 | Re: High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix |
| Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2007-11-16 13:59:37 | Off-Topic: Float point division academia? (was: Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-16 17:38:08 | Re: pg_ctl -t N register ?? |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2007-11-16 13:30:42 | Re: hashlittle(), hashbig(), hashword() and endianness |