Re: autovacuum: recommended?

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Gábor Farkas <gabor(at)nekomancer(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autovacuum: recommended?
Date: 2007-11-16 09:45:41
Message-ID: 20071116094541.GA5177@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:40:43AM +0100, Gábor Farkas wrote:
> we are moving one database from postgresql-7.4 to postgresql-8.2.4.

any particular reason why not 8.2.5?
>
> my question is: is it recommended to use it? or in other words, should i
> only use autovacuum? or it's better to use manual-vacuuming? which one
> is the "way of the future" :) ? or should i use both auto-vacuum and
> manual-vacuum?

autovacuum is definitely prefered (for most of the cases).

you might want to set vacuum delays though.

depesz

--
quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a
highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :)
http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tobias Brox 2007-11-16 11:13:55 Re: autovacuum: recommended?
Previous Message Ow Mun Heng 2007-11-16 09:43:05 Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD