|From:||Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>|
|To:||Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>|
|Cc:||Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: Slow regression tests on windows|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:01:26AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>From what I can see MinGW regression is somewhat slower than MSVC (and
> >>even than Cygwin) on my buildfarm VM that runs all three, even though
> >>the latter two are rate limited by MAX_CONNECTIONS.
> >Uh, you're saying MSVC and Cygwin somehow differ from MingW?
> I'm saying my buildfarm members differ from each other.
Ah. I thought you meant we had some builtin cap in the regression tests,
which is what confused me.
> In fact, on the last run of each, MinGW was by far the slowest and
> Cygwin the fastest in the "make check" step. But there could be any
> number of reasons for that, including extraneous activity on the VM host
> that could have slowed the whole VM down.
Yeah. It does surprise me a lot that cygwin should be fastest, really.
> Anyway, comparing regression test speeds is probably not very productive.
|Next Message||Bruce Momjian||2007-11-05 16:10:39||Re: Proposal: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE INTO USING (for 8.4)|
|Previous Message||Gokulakannan Somasundaram||2007-11-05 16:02:08||Re: Fwd: Clarification about HOT|