| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <wieck(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Date: | 2007-10-11 16:46:12 |
| Message-ID: | 200710111646.l9BGkDa00561@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> > > The results have nothing to do with whether the process was followed.
> > > We do not ignore process violations just because the outcome was OK.
> >
> > Agreed. But reversing something that came out OK for no other reason
> > than that the process was violated? I know you don't, but some people
> > are asking for exactly that.
>
> So as long as something is committed, and only breaks certain (for now
> unnamed) platforms (until fixed that is), then procedure doesn't apply.
No, if someone does this again they are going to be raked over the coals
like Jan was. That is probably enough to keep people following procedure.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-10-11 16:56:21 | Re: Some questions about mammoth replication |
| Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-10-11 16:11:28 | Re: [HACKERS] quote_literal with NULL |