| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Stephen Ince" <since(at)opendemand(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
| Date: | 2007-08-27 17:04:39 |
| Message-ID: | 200708271804400000@1426722598 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: "Stephen Ince" <since(at)opendemand(dot)com>
> To: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Sent: 27/08/07, 17:02:21
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
>
> Postgres can't be embedded or serverless. Firebird has the embedded feature.
> Most of the databases have this capability (hsqldb, derby,oracle,mysql,
> firebird, and db2). Derby and hsqldb are the only free embedded databases
> for commercial use.
>
SQL Server CE is also free for commercial use iirc.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-08-27 17:14:23 | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-08-27 17:04:28 | Re: Tables dissapearing |