From: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: INSERT before UPDATE? |
Date: | 2007-08-16 12:37:15 |
Message-ID: | 20070816123715.GA19295@a-kretschmer.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
am Thu, dem 16.08.2007, um 14:11:07 +0200 mailte Ji??í N??mec folgendes:
> > see
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/plpgsql-control-structures.html#PLPGSQL-UPSERT-EXAMPLE
>
> Yes I see, but I'll try to describe it in more detail:
>
> I could write plpgsql trigger function which will UPDATE a record (or
> INSERT new record) when the record is not found. But as far as I know
> a trigger is not executed when a updated record is not found, so this
> solution doesn't work for me. I don't want to change my application -
> I would like to set this behaviour directly in PostgreSQL database so
> I couldn't use a method from your example (...which requires that all
> SQL UPDATE statements need to be modified).
Maybe you can achieve this with a RULE.
I'm not sure, but i would try ist.
Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Phoenix Kiula | 2007-08-16 12:48:07 | Accessing tables in other databases, through functions |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-08-16 12:02:58 | Re: Yet Another COUNT(*)...WHERE...question |