Re: Yet Another COUNT(*)...WHERE...question

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Rainer Bauer <usenet(at)munnin(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Yet Another COUNT(*)...WHERE...question
Date: 2007-08-16 12:02:58
Message-ID: 20070816120258.GA15940@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 01:09:32PM +0200, Rainer Bauer wrote:
> Anyway, what Phoenix is trying to say is that 2 queries are required: One to
> get the total count and one to get the tuples for the current page. I reckon
> it would help, if the query returning the result set could also report the
> total no. of tuples found. Somthing like
> SELECT COUNT(*), * FROM <table> WHERE <cond> OFFSET <o> LIMIT <l>

Well, thee is another possibility, use cursors:

DECLARE CURSOR ... AS <query>;
FETCH 30 -- or however many to want now
MOVE TO END -- or whatever the command is, this gives you the number of rows

Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A. Kretschmer 2007-08-16 12:37:15 Re: INSERT before UPDATE?
Previous Message Phoenix Kiula 2007-08-16 11:57:10 Re: Fastest way to import only ONE column into a table? (COPY doesn't work)